• Mon. Sep 21st, 2026

PIMS Health Secretary Replaced for Second Time in a Month

The federal government has replaced the Secretary of the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) in Islamabad for the second time within a month, reflecting ongoing administrative instability at one of the capital’s largest public hospitals.

The frequent change in leadership at PIMS, one of the country’s premier public healthcare and teaching institutions, has raised concerns among hospital staff and health policy observers about continuity in hospital administration and ongoing reform efforts. No official reason has been publicly detailed for the latest change in the health secretary’s post overseeing the institution.

A Pattern of Frequent Transfers

This marks the second such change in the space of a month, a pace of turnover that is unusual even by the standards of Pakistan’s bureaucracy, where transfers and postings of senior officials are common. Officials familiar with the matter say the repeated changes have made it difficult for the hospital’s administration to pursue longer-term reforms in service delivery, procurement, and management of the institute’s various departments.

PIMS serves as one of the primary referral hospitals for Islamabad and surrounding areas, handling a large volume of patients daily across its various departments, including emergency, surgical, and specialized care units. Frequent leadership changes at such institutions can disrupt ongoing projects, budget planning, and staff management, according to health sector analysts.

What This Means for Hospital Operations

Hospital sources say day-to-day patient care services at PIMS continue to operate normally despite the administrative changes, with the transition affecting primarily the institute’s executive and policy-level decision-making. The incoming secretary is expected to take charge of ongoing initiatives, including infrastructure upgrades and efforts to improve patient services at the facility.

Health sector observers have called for greater stability in leadership appointments at major public hospitals, arguing that consistent administration is essential for implementing long-term improvements in healthcare quality and hospital management across federally administered institutions.